GBH - Trik Forum

Master · **GBH -** 08-03-2007, 01:46 PM

Should GM lower GBH damage?

Y · 08-03-2007, 03:22 PM

Dude.. this is forum not any damn game public chat. If you wanna get GBH damage down, make some arguements about it. Like why should it be lowered.

I myself honestly think, that GBH damage is not too high. You can still easily own GBH warriors, and gbh's range is only 2 blocks and its a hammer. It needs 600str to equip and its not superior, comparing to any other weapon.

Make some arguements why should it be lowered, thanks.

Enter · 08-03-2007, 03:30 PM

this is gonna be an endless poll .. mages vote yes warr vote no .

74 · 08-03-2007, 03:33 PM

I think it's a bit too high considering they are fairly cheap (even though they hardly drop anymore). I remember a time where I was casting a spell and this GBH warrior crits me 3-4 times while I had an ownage PA set on and he killed me. He did do high damage (I get hit 600+ frequently which is higher than KB and most KA warriors) but the thing that made me die so easily was that he stripped three pieces of armor in the 3-4 crits and yes, my armor was fully repaired. It all seemed to be pure bad luck but I don't think it should be possible.

I think it should have its damage slightly lowered but nothing huge. Also, the thing that is annoying is that it strips my armor so easily even when it's fully repaired. I think it shouldn't strip high endurance armors.

Please note that I can live with the GBH damage as it is now, but to balance it perfectly, it needs to hit a little bit lower and the strip rate to be adjusted. Again, nothing huge.

Dragonis · 08-03-2007, 05:19 PM

I agree with 74, if its going to be lowered, it only needs to be lowered a little bit. Its bearable right now the way it is, and it is a bit harder to come by now since it doesnt really drop, and prices for it have been sky rocketing. Which is a good thing if u think of how good it is. If it was taken completely out of drop rate and it cost BP to buy it, if it cost like 800-900 it would be worth getting and you wouldnt even need to lower the dmg because it would be a higher end item, not a beginner wpn like it is now. Which i dont even understand why it still is when its not so easy to get. I remember when you could get one for like 20-50pts easy, now u can barely find someone selling it for less then 150+. Honestly the price should just go up for it to stop peoples bitching about the high dmg rather then lower it over and over and over.

Enter · 08-03-2007, 05:24 PM

prices are determind by players tho , since it dont drop now ( i think ) i guess we should raise the price cos of its dmg / str req .

Y · 08-03-2007, 05:27 PM

Ehh lower the strip rate? Its Giant Battle Hammer, because of the strip rate. If know anything about GBH, its unique just and only because of the strip rate, so why would they take the unique part of it off. Its like taking paralyzing effect from Medusa off.

I don't myself use GBH, I use Kaxe, but I still think that it shouldn't be lowered. Its needs a damn 600str, all mage spells need only 400int, compare to that!

And it SHOULD be higher dmg than kaxe, because it has higher str requiments, and its a damn hammer, what has sucky hitting prob.

I honestly think they should leave it as it is / slightly increase dmg.

Dragonis · 08-03-2007, 05:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Y

Ehh lower the strip rate? Its Giant Battle Hammer, because of the strip rate. If know anything about GBH, its unique just and only because of the strip rate, so why would they take the unique part of it off. Its like taking paralyzing effect from Medusa off.

I don't myself use GBH, I use Kaxe, but I still think that it shouldn't be lowered. Its needs a **** 600str, all mage spells need only 400int, compare to that!

And it SHOULD be higher dmg than kaxe, because it has higher str requiments, and its a **** hammer, what has sucky hitting prob.

I honestly think they should leave it as it is / slightly increase dmg.

you just made a good point i didnt even think of. Yeah a mages best spell only costs 400int, and most wars only have about 400-500str but some people use the extra 100-200str to use gbh with 600-700str, and the fact that the hammer has such a low hitting prob and a small ass crit range. So i retract my former statement and say that I think it should just remain as is right now, and we as players raise the price 8-)

SikWar · 08-03-2007, 06:53 PM

when the GBH dmg was 1st increased... i wanted to sell my GBH for 400 points... ppl laffed at me... i tried to explain to the person wanting to buy the weapon tht it did insane dmg... and its stripped like hell... ppl were offering me 50-80 points... i told them all to bugger off... i seriously think the price for gbh should be in the high 500;s range

74 · 08-03-2007, 11:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Y

Ehh lower the strip rate? Its Giant Battle Hammer, because of the strip rate. If know anything about GBH, its unique just and only because of the strip rate, so why would they take the unique part of it off. Its like taking paralyzing effect from Medusa off.

No one said the armor strip should be removed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Y

I don't myself use GBH, I use Kaxe, but I still think that it shouldn't be lowered. Its needs a **** 600str, all mage spells need only 400int, compare to that!

Yeah and mages need 700 mag. It's balanced...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Y

I honestly think they should leave it as it is / slightly increase dmg.

If it should have higher endurance, then the price of it MUST be raised or else every new player will get a GBH and own. Also, then there would have to be a decent replacement for GBH for new players to buy and use until they get deva or KA or whatever they choose to get.

BuddyBoy · 08-04-2007, 12:18 AM

dmg is fine, IF the cost were increased... and heres a warrior speaking so dont whine thinking I'm a pissed mage :lol:

Master · 08-04-2007, 05:54 AM

To me makes GBH too high dmg. And that weap is so cheap. It doesnt matter that i have PA plate,helm and DR haub and devil legs, GBH warrior strips me with 2 hits and 1 hit to kill....

nOObsOda · 08-04-2007, 05:11 PM

it is juz nice imo , i'm a mage and i hate fighting gbh war

Vahvel · 08-05-2007, 12:06 AM

Well, i got a GBH, i have tried to kill someone with it, but... lol, i have around 40 EK's...
The hitting prop sucks hard, and i got like 350dex only... and then my hitting prob is more low..., i don't have BP's for an angel, well, i think GBH is fine, but i didn't know that mages need 700 mag?

Atmosphere · 08-05-2007, 12:16 AM

i think its just fine the low HP makes up for the dmg at least it does in my eyes.

Y · 08-05-2007, 02:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 74

Yeah and mages need 700 mag. It's balanced...

Lol.. wth ur talking about, mages dont need 700mag for anything, even they can take it if they want.
You can just straightly compare that "mages need 700mag" bullshit to "warrs need 700dex",
it goes to same category. And I have 700dex with my warr, so we can only compare int and str requiments, as they are equal.

Have no idea, where u put that 700mag there, could you please make that more clear to me..