Evony Guides and Help
Trik Forum - RuneScape Forum  
Register Forum Homepage Members Mark Forums Read


Trik Members: 34,702 | Total Posts: 134,006 | Total Threads: 25,847
Welcome to our newest member, Botterboi.
Go Back   Trik Forum - RuneScape Forum > Runescape 2 Cheating > Runescape Private Servers
Reload this Page Enable armor break for warriors?
Runescape Private Servers Advertise your Runescape private server(s) here. Discuss about servers, post tutorials, get help, read people's developments, etc.


View Poll Results: Enable armor break for warriors?
Yes, 200int req (same as amp) 21 31.34%
Yes, but ill post my int req thoughts 7 10.45%
No, keep it how it is. 19 28.36%
No, but increase int req to 600 20 29.85%
Voters: 67. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Enable armor break for warriors?
Old
  (#1)
kinger is Offline
Army Commander
kinger
 
Posts: 1,991
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North East, USA
   
Default Enable armor break for warriors? - 07-06-2007, 08:55 AM

Please vote on enabling warriors to be able to get armor break. Thank you.

The results of this poll are not final.

Currently amp is 400int.

Max spells for mages are 400int.

My thoughts were making is 200int if you all want it enabled. (same as amp)


  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#2)
ababababab is Offline
Private Second Class
ababababab
 
Posts: 98
Join Date: Jul 2007
   
Default 07-06-2007, 09:01 AM

Normal inteligence...

ArmorBreak shoulndt have effect over PFM....
So if u fix that, then use normal req. on AB....


..lala..amarillo gay.
  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#3)
Geronimo is Offline
Lieutenant
Geronimo
 
Posts: 397
Join Date: Jun 2007
   
Default 07-06-2007, 09:03 AM

My vote is to lower the spell to 1 piece strip per hit and leave it the way it is... If not make it 600 int.
  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#4)
kinger is Offline
Army Commander
kinger
 
Posts: 1,991
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North East, USA
   
Default 07-06-2007, 09:04 AM

Unfortunately I have alot to do and adjusting the spell itself is something I dont have time to learn at this time. If any of you know such item code changes let me know. Just not enough time to learn 1 per hit or effect over pfm. Although I agree with the suggestions.


  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#5)
74 is Offline
Captain
74
 
Posts: 719
Join Date: Jun 2007
   
Default 07-06-2007, 09:11 AM

It would be cool if warriors could have a spell called Shield Break. It would require 200 intelligence and like 200 str+dex just to make sure mages don't buy it. Just an idea I got.


  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#6)
Geronimo is Offline
Lieutenant
Geronimo
 
Posts: 397
Join Date: Jun 2007
   
Default 07-06-2007, 09:33 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by kinger
Unfortunately I have alot to do and adjusting the spell itself is something I dont have time to learn at this time. If any of you know such item code changes let me know. Just not enough time to learn 1 per hit or effect over pfm. Although I agree with the suggestions.

Yes thats true, a lot of coding needed :cry:

I think that only with Amp, wars can make mages life impossible if they know how to use it, if they also have Armor break, they will own every mage in the server... i think that if wars can have AB, some mages would like to have MIM (not my case coz i dont like it at all).

The easiest solution will be for me make it 600 int so mages won't waste 200 points for it and they won't get it...
  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#7)
ababababab is Offline
Private Second Class
ababababab
 
Posts: 98
Join Date: Jul 2007
   
Default 07-06-2007, 09:39 AM

stop inventing shits.... "shield breaK"? wtf ? PLAY HB MFKR.


..lala..amarillo gay.
  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#8)
74 is Offline
Captain
74
 
Posts: 719
Join Date: Jun 2007
   
Default 07-06-2007, 09:44 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by ababababab
stop inventing ****.... "shield breaK"? wtf ? PLAY HB MFKR.
Let's all insult each other if we don't like their ideas.


  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#9)
kinger is Offline
Army Commander
kinger
 
Posts: 1,991
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North East, USA
   
Default 07-06-2007, 09:57 AM

do not turn this into a flame thread. goto a WoW forum for that.


  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#10)
Toilet is Offline
Corporal
Toilet
 
Posts: 215
Join Date: Jun 2007
   
Default 07-06-2007, 12:01 PM

My views= Armor break should be 200 int. Look at this way A war is taking the risk to cast while fighting, that alone would get them killed + by the time the spells hits and there wep is equipt they could be fully suited again. On the other hand constant armor breaking and amp cost mana so a solution too make it fair is up the mana requirment for Amor break, so they need blues to keep the spell running.



African Guild Made it. THE BOYS !
  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#11)
Enter is Offline
Army Commander
Enter
 
Posts: 2,884
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: None
  Send a message via MSN to Enter  
Default 07-06-2007, 12:45 PM

i would go for 200 int since mages have it , y not warr ? like the idea on shield - break tho . each classes have its own spell , cool


When you think you have the moral right to judge others, its only because you have already lost your morality.
  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#12)
kinger is Offline
Army Commander
kinger
 
Posts: 1,991
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North East, USA
   
Default 07-06-2007, 10:48 PM

SO far I think its going to be 200int. Bumped. Keep voting.


  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#13)
helpigs is Offline
Corporal
helpigs
 
Posts: 137
Join Date: Jun 2007
   
Default 07-07-2007, 09:37 AM

hmmm..200 int.. but it should not pierce through pfm... wars have enough trouble fighting wars with their armor on.. with wars armor breaking eachother it would be damn hard...especially with mages ESW ing at the same time... mages would then say that MA set wars would own.. but my MA set is now almost 180% lol.. and mages still hurt... (the pro mages anyway)

As for shield break.. LOL....
Perhaps to balance the usage of shield for mages... magic shield wand's PA & DEF should be lowered and/or higher strength/dex requirements to hold it
  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#14)
MaxSan is Offline
Private Second Class
MaxSan
 
Posts: 73
Join Date: Jun 2007
   
Default 07-10-2007, 08:11 PM

I dont know about the PA for magic shield wand but the Def is like +10? Still need to be lowered?
I would vote for AB to stay the same becoz AMP warrs are very good against mages now, if AB were to be 200 int, AMP+AB warrs can take any mage or warr 1 on 1 no problemo


BaoBei
  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#15)
Sephrioth is Offline
Private
Sephrioth
 
Posts: 4
Join Date: Jul 2007
   
Default 07-11-2007, 01:22 AM

How about giving it like 1in3 chance of stripping ?


  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#16)
helpigs is Offline
Corporal
helpigs
 
Posts: 137
Join Date: Jun 2007
   
Default 07-11-2007, 06:30 AM

mshield wand has PA... thats why war's do -1 dmg's.. tower + mshield + pa armor = rox

The requirements to hold it should be heightened so its more fair.. i mean wars with a ma180% set and PFM is still going to get like -50 to -100* dmg per wave.. (so 1 spell can possibly do like -400dmg*).. and amp requires wars to pump 200int... so it should be fair to make it like 200str to hold mshield wand...


*10k rep
  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#17)
rok3z is Offline
Private Second Class
rok3z
 
Posts: 91
Join Date: Jul 2007
   
Default 07-11-2007, 11:02 AM

Quote:
Originally Posted by Geronimo
Quote:
Originally Posted by kinger
Unfortunately I have alot to do and adjusting the spell itself is something I dont have time to learn at this time. If any of you know such item code changes let me know. Just not enough time to learn 1 per hit or effect over pfm. Although I agree with the suggestions.

Yes thats true, a lot of coding needed :cry:

I think that only with Amp, wars can make mages life impossible if they know how to use it, if they also have Armor break, they will own every mage in the server... i think that if wars can have AB, some mages would like to have MIM (not my case coz i dont like it at all).

The easiest solution will be for me make it 600 int so mages won't waste 200 points for it and they won't get it...
LIES"
they wouldnt own every mage, since they just MS and warrs dont have cancel, and AB dont work through MS, and 90+% of the mages are all time MSed
  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#18)
ababababab is Offline
Private Second Class
ababababab
 
Posts: 98
Join Date: Jul 2007
   
Default 07-11-2007, 04:36 PM

just put normal int req. and it dont work over pfm-amp-ms.... and thats it... enjoy all.


..lala..amarillo gay.
  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#19)
Bloodsho is Offline
Sergeant
Bloodsho
 
Posts: 341
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Bloodsho/Bloodmage
  Send a message via AIM to Bloodsho Send a message via MSN to Bloodsho  
Default 07-11-2007, 04:44 PM

Quote:
Originally Posted by 74
It would be cool if warriors could have a spell called Shield Break. It would require 200 intelligence and like 200 str+dex just to make sure mages don't buy it. Just an idea I got.
woudlnt help at all tho >.> ...most mages i know keep shield on F2/F3 there fore once they got Hit with that they owuld only have to press one button to get it back on....inturn the warrior just wasted time casting there fore left behind and gave mage time to stop and cast spell at him........UNLESS what your are saying is completely BREEAK the shield like 0 endurance then that would help 8-)


  
Share with Facebook
Old
  (#20)
rok3z is Offline
Private Second Class
rok3z
 
Posts: 91
Join Date: Jul 2007
   
Default 07-11-2007, 08:23 PM

shield brake seems nice, but taking it away is 2 easy to pout it back on, as blood says, the solution will be making that spell BREAK the shield, but, if every warr has that, why would shields even exist?
i never liked the shield stuff, its ridicolous, ur owning a guy and sudenly he wears shield and u cant touch him anymore, he just waaalks sloooowwllyy to safe..

I find this the best solution
Make shield skill 0%, and shields defense extremely lowered, so they are only used to have a LITTLE extra defense, not mass impenetrable defense that you can only get hited ONE by warriors, that makes it a little unfair :S
  
Share with Facebook
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off





======================================================================================== ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ========================================================================================

Your Ad Here

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Trik.com